#Gimp vs photoshop professional#
Lots of contemporary retouchers considered Photoshop or maximum Lightroom as the only retouching programs that are suitable for everyday professional work. You will see the real difference between Gimp and Photoshop.
Firstly, let`s begin with a piece of video. In the following article we are going to find an answer to a question is Gimp better than Photoshop? For this we will try to efficiently compare the Gimp vs Photoshop elements by discussing their similarities and differences as well as sphere of everyday application. Gimp is a retouching program that may replace Photoshop in photo editing service according to some minds, but is it really so? Or Photoshop will stay irreplaceable forever having no competitors at all? Gimp presumably spends enough of its resources keeping anyone on the project, and can't be choosy beggars when it turns out that it attracts programmers who are allured by the technical aspects of the project, or have some moral requirement to support OSS.Gimp vs Photoshop elements have become a target for retouchers and photographers` interest. This demands not just polish (which programmers know about) or design (which they can learn) but intuition about the subjective way regular users and complete newbs think (which is anathema to a logical programming mindset) and at least a little bit of art (hsss!).Īdobe just hires artists, UX designers, and focus groups, and threatens their developers' pay if they don't satisfy their requirements. UX isn't just about having some path to a particular functionality, it's having an optimal path to as many functions as possible, while being explorable, intuitive, consistent, aesthetically pleasing, and snappy to use. It's compiled away to bits and bytes, hidden from sight.Īpplying this same process to UX results in, well, Gimp. After all, a hideous method or class that gets the job done at least works, and the user is none the wiser as to its inefficiencies if it's low-impact enough.
#Gimp vs photoshop code#
Usually when coding, you start with a quick'n'dirty solution that you slowly over time make more robust, addressing shortcomings as they come up and otherwise leaving code that started out good enough alone. I have this theory that most career programmers subconsciously (incorrectly) apply their instincts for evaluating code to UX. r/FreeCAD FOSS Parametrical CAD/CAM /r/scribus Desktop Publishing Darktable FOSS tool for photographersīecause the sort of people it attracts to develop it are programmers, and programmers as a breed are terrible at UX in general.
#Gimp vs photoshop software#
r/gmic FOSS image processing framework /r/inkscape Vector-based graphic editor /r/blender 3D modeling, animation, & rendering /r/mypaint painting for digital painters /r/darktable/ photo editing software /r/krita digital painting application /r/synfig FOSS 2D Animation /r/FOSSPhotography Folks who use all the above /r/libredesign changing the paradigm Other Links of Interest
0 kommentar(er)
